Why Boys Don't Play with Dolls vs. 300

Why Boys Don't Play with Dolls vs. 300

Why Boys Don't Play with Dolls - This is an essay written by Katha Pollitt that is focused on the stereotypes of men and women. She talks about how even though organizations like NOW have made an effort to over come those stereotypes, they are still heavily prevalent. She explains why boys still like playing with trucks and why girls still like playing with dolls. She also says how men and women alike are both trying to break the stereotype, but at the same time how certain characteristics of men and women haven't changed and probably never will.

300 - This is a movie based on the true historical event about how a small army of Spartans held up against the mighty Persian Empire. This move talks about the common stereotype of men always being strong, always fighting, and doing all of the heroic stuff while the women stay at home, do nothing, and worry. It shows the common stereotypes at their peak. The men go out and look buff and meaty, while the women like gorgeous, weak, and needy. But towards the end of the movie, the producers show that women can play the role of strength as well as men can, and how men can my emotional, meek, and caring like women can.

The Meaning of Joy

My Definition of Joy - The feeling of complete happiness. The desire to do nothing else in the world except that one thing that makes all your fears, troubles, and worries disappear like the dark shadows of night when the sun comes up.

Kristin's Definition of Joy - "to me, is doing something that makes me happy. It's something that that makes me smile and laugh constantly. It would also make me feel calm and relaxed."

Sythesis of Kristin's and my Definition of Joy - Joy is an emotion that gives a person happiness, laughter, and desires. It also drives away any anwanted emtions. Joy is a. "warm," emotion that can bring people up from a dark, "cold," mood. It is a state of content, being at peace with things and relaxed.

Brian Miller Eng. 105 Allegory of the Cave 2/14/08 In Socrates' Allegory of the Cave, he talks about what it is like to be prisoner trapped and sheltered from the world. He uses the idea of prisoners who have been held captive since their birth. They are chained to a wall and are taught by shadows of real images being projected up on a wall by fire light. The prisoners think that the shadows the real world and the real actual objects. They do not know that they are being shrouded in illusion and lies. What they don't know is that the light of the sun is just behind them, and that there is a wall blocking the puppeteers who are keeping them in darkness. This wall also blocks the sun light of truth and the process of free thinking. But one day, one of the prisoners breaks their chains and is able to walk out of the cave. He gets up and walks passed the wall that shields the puppeteers, passed the fire light the illuminates and illustrates the shadows of the objects being projected on the wall, and sees the true light and the real world for the first time. This is a very accurate representation of what happens when people find out the truth about their corrupt government, when a person finds out that they have been lied to, when an truth is discovered that alters a person's way of thinking or opinion. When people actually break the chains that they didn't know they were bound by, they have this awe stricken feeling of betrayal. To come to the realization that they were being fooled, tricked, manipulated, taken advantage of, or used is very demoralizing. It give a person a feeling of mistrust towards whatever institution or person had done that to them. In my own experience, I have had that sudden realization of the real truth. I have been in a situation in which I had found out that not everything that you hear is true. When I learned that Santa Clause wasn't real. When I was eight years old, on Christmas Eve, my parents had their bedroom door locked and I could hear the sound of crinkling paper. I asked what was going in, and they said that they were busy. The next morning I compared the writing on the two presents, one was from Santa and the other was from my mom. I looked at the two in comparisson and found that they were strickingly similar. They both had the same basic form and look. I kept this to myself and didn't mention a word to either of my parents until the following year.

It was the next Christmas season, almost a whole year since me realization that Santa wasn't exactly who I thought he was, and my parents told me about how Santa wasn't real. I already made that discovery so I didn't take it as hard, but I still wanted to know why they did it. They didn't give a straight answer then so I was left to ponder the thought of why my parents would lie about something like that. I drew many conclusions about it and have reached several answers. I also applied these answers to the Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, and all other holiday chatacters that seemed to serve no purpose or seemed to have a skewed view of the holidays.

Through these observations and conclusions, I was able to break the chains of gullibilty and was able to critically think about what information I hear and decide if it is valid or a fictional story that has some other purpose in the background that can't be seen unless the chains are broken and you are able to get up and walk out of the cave.

Brian Miller
Eng. 105
2/10/08

The Harm of Gender Roles

Ever since the creation of the earth, men and women have been placed into different roles, or classes that restrict what the can and cannot do. For hundreds of thousands of years, men have been mainly portrayed as the protector, the provider, and the leader; basiclly anything that has to do with fixing, defending, or having power over other people. Women have typically taken up the classification of being the healer, homemaker, and supporter of the males. But are these structured classes helpful in an organized society? It can help in a way because it maintains order and peace. But if someone doesn't want to be in that stereotype, then problems may occor. This whole basis of a cast system for deciding how men and women should behave, participate, and contribute to society is putting heavy limitations on both men and women that they could really do without.

If

Brian Miller
Eng. 105
Rhetoric Analysis on Ad
1/27/08

Author – The author of this ad is Bebe. They are a fashion clothes designer brand.

Audience – There audience is any and all young teenagers who are trying to look older and more attractive.

Purpose – The ad is telling younger people that in order to attract other friends and potential boyfriends, they need to buy their clothes or look like the girl wearing them.

Pathos – Bebe advertising executives are trying to give girls the sense of looking sexy, hot, and attractive. They do this by getting some model to dress in their clothes, make her look what the media declares as, “drop dead gorgeous,” and also highlight parts of her body that would generally get men to stare at the advertisement too, so it give girls a reason to buy them.

Ethos – The ethics behind this advertisement are not good ones. They exploit women and airbrush their models to give them a sweat-dripping sex appeal, that is fake, not normal by all means, and gives girls and guys alike, a false impression.

Logos – Their logic makes perfect sense. If they can get guys to see it and say, “Yoah, that’s hot,” and get girls to want to look like that because the girl on the picture looks majestic and because guys see it as attractive, then they hope that those will help sell their product.

Brian Miller
Eng. 105
Respond to Anne Lamott's essay
1/20/08
In reading Anne Lamott’s essay on rough drafts, I have found some differences and similarities with my own. She talked about her brain being overloaded with ideas, but couldn’t sort them out and make her first draft seem good enough. She talked about how she wasn’t quite able to get the perfect opening paragraph to be riveting enough to grab her reader’s attention for her food reviews. By reading her essay, I was able to identify my writing process more clearly and be able to see the strengths and weaknesses of it.

The first strength I saw with my writing style was that I get everything down on paper, not really caring about how it looks. As Anne said in her essay, it is better to just throw everything down on paper and worry about the details later, because if you try and make it perfect in the beginning, you might lose an important idea or concept for whatever you are writing. The trick to the first draft is to not care about it. You need to be able to see it as a big list of everything that is in your head that you want to put into your writing. Kids in grade school were taught to do that using other methods, like brainstorming with other kids, writing a list down, making bubble charts, and so on. All of those methods are the first draft of a writing piece.

A definite weakness I saw after reading Anne’s essay was my laziness in proofreading and making corrections as I write my first draft. I don’t like to take the time to read over my work. I think it’s tedious and a daunting task, so I read my work as a write and make edits to where I think they are necessary. I would rather have someone else review my work and give me suggestions on what paragraphs need to be fixed, or what words are misspelled, or if my topic and conclusion sentences are choppy, or anything like that. But if I can’t find anyone to help me with it, then I just make corrections as a write. But if I can find someone, to look over it and give me suggestions, then I will take the time to go over it.

I don’t think blogging will affect my writing at all. It’s just a different method of submitting my homework to my teacher. It makes it easier and my teacher to collect, look at, and grade, and easier on the students to turn in. My teacher doesn’t have to worry about keeping track of papers, and the students don’t have to worry about turning in a hard copy or forgetting to grab it off the printer and bringing it to class.